The Cross and Casting Stones
"Let him who is without
sin cast the first stone." This thought is often given as rationale for
casting any type of public moralizing aside. Evidently, we cannot
completely shake off our bequest from a Christian worldview. Ironically,
this moral conviction is often given with the reminder that all
morality is a private matter and not for public enforcement. But if all
moral convictions are a private matter, why is this very conviction
itself not kept private too? Why is it publicly enjoined?
When
I ask citers of this verse if they are aware of the context in which
these words were uttered, it is often unknown. One said it had to do
with the woman in adultery. I asked if he was aware of what prompted
that imperative and to whom Jesus aimed those words. There was silence.
Significantly, the entire confrontation came about because the Pharisees
were seeking to trap Jesus into
either explicitly defending the Law of Moses or implicitly overruling
it. The whole scenario was a ploy, not to seek out the truth of a moral
law, but to trap Jesus.
Fascinatingly, Jesus exposed their own spiritual bankruptcy by showing
them that at the heart of law is God's very character. There is a
spiritual essence that precedes moral injunctions. So when we
vociferously demand that only the one without sin may cast the first
stone we also need to grant credence to God's character in numerous
other pronouncements. But for some, sin is not even a viable category.
This selective use of Scripture is the very game the questioners of
Jesus were playing. When the law is quoted while the reality of sin is
denied, self-aggrandizing motives can override character. Thus, in our
spiritually amputated world, the art of obscuring truth has become a
Herein lies what I believe the crucial death of our character. There is
no transcendent context within which
to discuss moral theory. Just as words in order to have meaning must
point beyond themselves to a commonly understood real existence, so
also, must the reality point beyond itself to commonly accepted essence.
Otherwise, reality has no moral quotient and moral meaning dissolves
into the subjective, rendering it beyond debate. Only the transcendent
can unchangingly provide fixed moral worth.
But this death of the transcendent comes with a
two-edged sword, both for the skeptic and the Christian alike. Yes, the
law has moral value, but not as a means for shrewd lawyers to play
deadly word games, minimize immorality, and kill the truth. At the same
time the law has spiritual value so that we do not destroy the truly
repentant individual. The grace of God abounds to the worst in our
midst. Hidden in the odious nature of our failures is the scandalous
secret of God's forgiveness. When the prodigal returned, the anger he
faced was not the father's but the older
son's who failed to understand how marvelous was the grace of his
father. Throughout history, God's way of dealing with the reckless has
disclosed how dramatic are God's ways. We must allow for such
possibilities. "My son was dead, but is now alive." Death lay in the
wanderings of the passions and the seriousness of wrongdoing. Life was
spelled in true repentance to return and "sin no more." But let us take
note. Forgiveness is offered in full recognition of the heinousness of
what is being forgiven.
On the contrary, when words, consequences, and transcendent contexts
have died, a pigsty awaits. Only if we remember our Father's address can
we know where to return for forgiveness and love. But if we insist upon
arguing as quick-witted political power-mongers or legal wordsmiths
with no spiritual context, we may kill both law and love. This, I am
afraid, is the abyss over which we often hover.
Yet I am confident that as precipitous as the edge
seems, God has always been in the business of rescue. The truth is that
as human beings we all fall short. Our only hope is in God's ways,
through which forgiveness and responsibility come in balance. There is
indeed another bridge, one on which a body was broken so that a path was
made that we might cross over and live. In that cross lie both judgment
and mercy. The Judge of all the earth cannot be fooled by shades of
meaning, nor was Christ obliterated by the shadows of death.
God is our help and our hope in ages past and years to come.
Ravi Zacharias is founder and chairman of the board of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
On Government & Individuality
The 2020 presidential campaign was notable for hate-filled character assassination and manipulation of people’s fears. For instance, there w...
-
This signature on each soul may be a product of heredity and environment, but that only means that heredity and environment are among the in...
-
We came home from Gran Pacifica last night unsure of what we were doing today and unsure if we would see our friend Gerard again. Both ques...
-
Tirian had thought—or he would have thought if he had time to think at all—that they were inside a little thatched stable, about twelve feet...
No comments:
Post a Comment